<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remove jargon &#8211; copywriting tip #6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/2008/07/16/remove-jargon-copywriting-tip-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/2008/07/16/remove-jargon-copywriting-tip-6/</link>
	<description>Carefully crafted copy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jargon &#8211; persuading your clients to ditch their special words &#124; Copywriter &#124; Freelance Web / SEO Copywriter &#124; Brighton/London</title>
		<link>http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/2008/07/16/remove-jargon-copywriting-tip-6/comment-page-1/#comment-24336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jargon &#8211; persuading your clients to ditch their special words &#124; Copywriter &#124; Freelance Web / SEO Copywriter &#124; Brighton/London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/?p=136#comment-24336</guid>
		<description>[...] An earlier blog post about jargon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An earlier blog post about jargon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brighton Copywriter - Freelance Copywriting, Web Copy and Search Engine Optimisation Services (SEO) &#187; Literary junk food - why you shouldn&#8217;t limit your vocabulary</title>
		<link>http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/2008/07/16/remove-jargon-copywriting-tip-6/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Brighton Copywriter - Freelance Copywriting, Web Copy and Search Engine Optimisation Services (SEO) &#187; Literary junk food - why you shouldn&#8217;t limit your vocabulary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/?p=136#comment-641</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s clearly a difficult balance to get right; I&#8217;m also a big fan of clear, easy to understand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s clearly a difficult balance to get right; I&#8217;m also a big fan of clear, easy to understand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leif Kendall</title>
		<link>http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/2008/07/16/remove-jargon-copywriting-tip-6/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Leif Kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/?p=136#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... so you&#039;ve been tempted by the dark side? 

I hear what you&#039;re saying Madhava, but I think we should all think differently about communications - and that includes &quot;serious&quot;, &quot;heavyweight&quot; tracts like business plans and annual reports. Just because a document is important I don&#039;t think it should be inflated or pompous or use language that isn&#039;t ordinary or every-day. I think honest, frank and clear language can be a refreshing alternative, and all the more powerful for it. 

What are we all so afraid of? Why do we have to cling to officious language when something is important? Surely we can be honest without being flippant? 

Big-sounding words are often very empty, whereas the more everyday language can be direct, strong and full of meaning.

I would like to see corporations speaking to clients, shareholders and their employees as they would speak to their neighbour: honest, open, frank and friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; so you&#8217;ve been tempted by the dark side? </p>
<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying Madhava, but I think we should all think differently about communications &#8211; and that includes &#8220;serious&#8221;, &#8220;heavyweight&#8221; tracts like business plans and annual reports. Just because a document is important I don&#8217;t think it should be inflated or pompous or use language that isn&#8217;t ordinary or every-day. I think honest, frank and clear language can be a refreshing alternative, and all the more powerful for it. </p>
<p>What are we all so afraid of? Why do we have to cling to officious language when something is important? Surely we can be honest without being flippant? </p>
<p>Big-sounding words are often very empty, whereas the more everyday language can be direct, strong and full of meaning.</p>
<p>I would like to see corporations speaking to clients, shareholders and their employees as they would speak to their neighbour: honest, open, frank and friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madhava M Bailey</title>
		<link>http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/2008/07/16/remove-jargon-copywriting-tip-6/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Madhava M Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kendallcopywriting.co.uk/?p=136#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Nice post. I agree with the spirit of it.

One thing though, sometimes the words you list as evil are exactly the kind of words required. It all depends on the goals of the business broadcasting and the nature of the audience. For instance, when writing a business plan or end-of-year report for shareholders of a bank.

Still, nice work Leif.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. I agree with the spirit of it.</p>
<p>One thing though, sometimes the words you list as evil are exactly the kind of words required. It all depends on the goals of the business broadcasting and the nature of the audience. For instance, when writing a business plan or end-of-year report for shareholders of a bank.</p>
<p>Still, nice work Leif.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
