Jargon – persuading your clients to ditch their special words

Chainsaw Training

I’ve just been wrestling with copy that’s so thickly coated with toxic jargon that I’ve had to wear a haz-chem suit just to get near it.

I’ve been working through it slowly, battering sludgy phrasing into sleek, efficient copy that everyone can understand. And then I happened to Tweet about it.

Clive Andrews asked me how I go about de-jargoning my clients’ copy. After I explained that I just use a mixture of judicious deletions and sensible replacements, Clive asked how I remove jargon without offending my clients. After all, jargon is often industry-specific lingo that helps to exclude outsiders by mystifying simple concepts unite groups by giving them a shared vocabulary, and people get quite attached to their ’special words’.

Persuading clients to ditch jargon

When I’m trying to encourage clients to accept my pruned and de-jargoned copy, I simply insist that clear copy sells, while jargon confuses. I never suggest that jargon is bad because I don’t like it.

Jargon is bad because it puts a thick blanket of stupid between your words and your reader. Using jargon is like hanging curtains over road signs.

My other trick for getting clients on the anti-jargon bandwagon is to get other people to do the arguing for me. So if I’m working with a few people in an organisation, I’ll suggest that jargon is probably hampering our goals and then ask the group for their thoughts.

This strategy is a gamble, because I’m just hoping that my colleagues will argue against the jargon. Luckily, they usually do.

An earlier blog post about jargon.

Thanks to Clive Andrews for his questions.

2 Responses to “Jargon – persuading your clients to ditch their special words”

  1. Thanks so much for your insight, Leif.

    I think some dedicated fans of jargon use it with the best of intentions. It demonstrates knowledge of their specialist subject and, as you say, gives people a shared vocabulary within their professional group.

    This is fine when they’re communicating between themselves, but if the outside world needs to understand, there can be issues.

    I like your point about working with people to find the best way to explain ideas, rather then fighting a lone battle against jargon.

    Thanks again for your ideas.

  2. Leif Kendall says:

    Hi Clive, you’re absolutely right – and I don’t mind industry-specific jargon that specialists use as short-cuts when communicating with each other.

    The jargon I really loathe is the generalised management speak which is so prevalent. Management speak is truly awful and only complicates our world, while bringing no real benefits.

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled